Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead

from Chris Barker

Subject:	Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead
From:	Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:47:54 +0100

It's a message, Ken :-)

Chris

On 29 Apr 2013, at 19:42, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> "Dinosaur" is a bit harsh, Nathan.  It's a matter of choice, surely.
> 
> There you go again, calling me Shirley.
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Chris Barker <= Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Wayne Harridge

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: another Brussels PAD--channelling HCB, Paul Braun
Next by Date:	[OM] IMG: Insects, Jim Nichols
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Ken Norton
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/4/2013: film is not dead, Bob Whitmire
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]