I had a quick look at some of my Xpro-1 raw files (sorry I know this is
the Olympus list but the X-Pro1 is closer to my 3Ti in use than the OMD)
and I have to say (which I really didn't want to be the case) that apart
from the colour rendition Aperture's view of my raw files look much
better in terms of detail and quite a bit of border is missing from the
LR files which I have just discovered from viewing the aperture version.
So I may just have to switch back Damn just when I was getting used to
the LR workflow - don't you just hate it when that happens
On 4/28/13 7:23 PM, SwissPace wrote:
> Finally Apple have got around to supporting the xtrans sensor and
> aperture would now see me raw files, I haven't done a comparison test
>
>
> On 4/18/13 5:18 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> Thanks, Bob. That's one more push . . .
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 18 Apr 2013, at 14:39, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> But as a long-time Aperture user, LR should be a piece of cake. I
>>> unhesitatingly recommend to all who ask to forget Photoshop for the time
>>> being and get the latest version of Lightroom. It's much less expensive,
>>> and does everything most of us need to do, with some notable exceptions
>>> that one can always take up later when one knows what one wants to do and
>>> why, and willingly takes the plunge into CS-whatever.
>>>
>>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|