| Subject: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 3/3/2013 and 8/3/2013: señoritas in low light |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2013 06:03:52 +1100 |
Is there such a thing as 'unreasonable' light? The first is a nice shot indeed. Jealous, me. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www.soultheft.com Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium - http://www.blurb.com/books/3732813 On 10/03/2013, at 5:33 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > This one is in more reasonable light: -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 3-D printing, was: New photos up, Bill Pearce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 3-D printing, was: New photos up, Andrew Fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 3/3/2013 and 8/3/2013: señoritas in low light, Nathan Wajsman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 3/3/2013 and 8/3/2013: señoritas in low light, Paul Braun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |