Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Visitor from the Forties

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Visitor from the Forties
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:30:22 -0500
Bill,

The 190/195 series was essentially an all metal version of the C-34 
Airmaster, which also had the same cantilever wing design, but was made of 
wood.  One of these was deteriorating at our airport when I was beginning to 
fly in the late 1950s.  I have a photo somewhere that shows it sitting 
outside in the snow.  I traced it some time ago and found it had been 
restored and was still flying.

I first recall these beautiful airplanes from my schoolboy days of the 
1930s.  The government bought some to do aerial mapping.  One was based at 
my home town for a while, and the pilot's son was enrolled in school with 
me.  As I recall, it had a hole in the cabin floor to permit photographs 
with a large aerial camera.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce@xxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Visitor from the Forties


> The Cessna 195 (and 190) were very unusual for the time, as both had a 
> fill
> cantilever wing, with no struts for support. The goal was to reduce drag
> from the struts, but they soon abandoned that plan. Probably found that 
> the
> drag from the strut was less than the penalty of the additional weight of
> the heavier wing spar.
>
> There is an often reproduced photo of the first Cessna with a full
> cantilever wing, where workers from the shop were standing shoulder to
> shoulder, front to back over the entire wing, supposedly  showing the
> strength. I'm betting people weighed less in those days.
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Ian Nichols
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:54 AM
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Visitor from the Forties
>
> On 17 October 2012 16:34, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Ian.
>>
>> It is hard to see from these images, but there is a circumferential
>> opening
>> at the back of the cowling that provides a smooth exit path.
>>
>
>
> Thought it would be something like that, which is very neat and, if done
> right (and it probably is here) could even add a bit of thrust due to the
> heat input along the way - a bit like the famous P-51D oil cooler.
>
>
>
> -- 
> Stand firm for what you believe in, until and unless logic and experience
> prove you wrong.  Remember: when the emperor looks naked, the emperor *is*
> naked, the truth and a lie are not "sort-of the same thing" and there is
> no aspect, no facet, no moment of life that can't be improved with pizza.
>
> -Daria Morgendorffer
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz