And how does that affect manual mode?
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/25/2012 5:17 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Agreed. DXO seemed to hold up the report as they didn't quite believe
> the findings. The sony sensor with Oly's secret sauce seem to really
> surpass the MFTcompetition and even Canyon APS-C. Interesting to
> compare to the new Nex though. Sony likely will use a denser CFA and
> perhaps higher ISO will suffer but color rendition a bit more
> accurate--but no complaints with the OM-5. Curiously it is clear the
> OM-D does have a true easily accessable ISO 100---it is called ISO
> "200" ;-) ---see quote below .
>
> "Dynamic range: At 1.7EV higher, the OM-D beats the Panasonic cameras
> hands-down. This is a significant gain. As seen on the chart, the
> dynamic progression for the G3/GX1 starts to stagnate at 800 ISO,
> whereas that of OM-D E-M5 continues to increase in amplitude, achieving
> 12.3EV at 200 ISO (a sensitivity that actually translates to 107 ISO)."
>
> The CHDK hack will allow one to see the "true ISO" as the cam must
> actually know this and not the dial setting.
>
> Standard, what standard? Mike
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|