I like the 3rd one best as well but I think you'll find that one big
reason is that the first two are a bit overexposed and lacking in
saturation and contrast. But I suspect all the requisite data is there
on your raw files and can be reprocessed to look more like #3.
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/26/2012 2:50 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> A visiting Monarch agreed to pose for a bit today.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Monarch+71.jpg.html
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Monarch+80.jpg.html
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Monarch+93.jpg.html
>
> The last one is my favorite.
>
> E-1 with Zuiko Digital 14-54 Version 1, ISO 200, RAW
>
> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
