Yes, it's inconvenient when real world data doesn't conform to
unfalsifiable computer model projections. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 4/17/2012 1:17 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> Mike
>
> It's a mistake to mention any problems because of climate change when
> Chuck is listening . . . :-)
>
> Chris
>
> On 16 Apr 2012, at 23:20, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> I think you may be listening to too many academics anxious for a
>> grant. Here are the actual numbers going back to 1950. Low
>> strength tornado reports have increased due to the recent
>> introduction of Doppler radar but for the biggies that would likely
>> have been reported even without Doppler radar absolutely nothing
>> unusual has been going on despite some moderate warming over that
>> period. If anything perhaps a slight decrease but not likely
>> statistically significant.
>> <http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/31/2011-us-tornado-year-analyzed-no-trend-indication-still-below-1974/>
>>
>>
>>
Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/2012 1:43 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>>> One of the consequences of global warming may be tornadoes in
>>> the currently nearly tornadoless PacNW :( Maybe the whole West
>>> Coast.
>>>
>>> Glad the affected listeros are OK. Could have been much worse I
>>> guess.
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|