| Subject: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:05:15 -0800 |
On 1/22/2012 9:11 AM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>> I can't speak for OM-EF adapters, but perhaps Mike is thinking of OM-4/3
>> adapters.
> Ooops! yes. OM>>4/3rds. My OM>>EF is chip-less
Oh! Never mind.
-Emily Litella
Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 2: mostly Madrid, Chris Barker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 22/1/2012: Calle Mayor in Aigües, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context, Mike Lazzari |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |