AG writes:
big snip
>Sharpness is only one factor. If you were to pick a lens based
>strictly on that, the 100/2 is easily the one to grab. The contrasting
>is definitely different. It is the contrastiest lens I have. Between
>the excessive sharpness and midtone expansion, the 100/2 is almost too
>brutal for things like portraiture. I find the 100/2.8 portraits to be
>a little easier to work with and seems to be more skintone friendly as
>the warmer nature of the lens acts like a very light yellow filter
>that raises skintones a tiny bit.
Thanks for super thorough post.
Almost pruchased 100/2 from John last year, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|