Nice one, Chris. I use my 35/3.5 as a walk-around lens on the E-1. Works
fine in most cases.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 9:51 AM
Subject: [OM] Flower and Bokeh, was The Top
> Here you are, Chuck, if you have time and inclination to examine:
>
> <http://images.threeshoes.biz/Flowers/Flowers/i-P4Vgfwz/0/M/D2011IMG1446-Cosmo-M.jpg>
>
> Taken with a 35/2.8 macro on my K-5. There might be some subject
> movement, but we have the closing stages of Hurricane Katya coasting up
> the British Isles, I gather.
>
> The bokeh is pretty smooth, and less distracting I grant you. The camera
> and lens combination are a pleasure to use, even though it's a bit long
> for a standard lens, it makes a well balanced piece of kit, both optically
> and physically.
>
> Chris
> (prepared for any other criticisms, of course).
>
> On 12 Sep 2011, at 11:19, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> But I think you've just emphasized my reason for disliking the bokeh.
>> You've noticed the bokeh rather than the flower.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 9/12/2011 1:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>>> I was just thinking how cool (even discreet) the bokeh looked, Chuck.
>>> I suppose it's one of those facets that you prefer or you don't
>>> (similar to the mirror lens discussion).
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
