AG writes:
>Strangely, I'm not so sure that the bokeh is necessarily better.
Different,
>yes, better? Depends on subject and background distances. It looks like
>there is a touch of harshness where the 2.8 is smooth, but much
smoother
>where the 2.8 is harsh. Way too early to know for sure. But it's still
a
>major "WOW" lens--especially wide-open.
Hmm, always presumed the bokeh was better and likely better than the
Z. 85 F2 that has some edgy bokeh with busy backgrounds
at about 10 ft back. Will be watching carefully for future posts with
examples.
Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|