ML Archiv: Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME

Subject:	Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME
From:	Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:19:40 +0100

Sounds like an excuse for lazy thinking, Andrew.  What sort of philosopher are 
you?

:-)

Chris

On 12 Apr 2011, at 10:49, Andrew Fildes wrote:

> In a sample this large (everyone), the difference is insignificant. 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OT age segregation - was RE: Good imagery, (continued) Re: [OM] OT age segregation - was RE: Good imagery, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] OT age segregation - was RE: Good imagery, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OT age segregation - was RE: Good imagery, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Good imagery, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Good imagery, Ken Norton Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Ken Norton Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Willie Wonka Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Chris Barker <= Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Bigger Game, Nicholas Herndon

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Andrew Fildes
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] BIGGER GAME, Ken Norton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]