| Subject: | Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good? |
|---|---|
| From: | Nicholas Herndon <nherndon@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:55:15 -0600 |
Thanks Chuck and Moose for the comments. Moose is correct, that picture was not intended to be seen as a portrait, but rather a snapshot. And I agree, the fireplace makes it. I am extremely pleased with the Oly E-P2 overall. It has not disappointed. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] - irradiated topaz - gieger counter anyone, Walters, Martin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OM) OT Canterbury earthquake info, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?, Moose |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |