I wasn't going to say, Andrew, but it does look rushed. There are several
tell-tale signs: punctuation, terminology ("thin" DOF), vague assertions. But
we, your fans, are happy . . . :-)
Chris
On 19 Nov 2010, at 20:48, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Could be better I agree but I was rushed. I think those who will be reading
> it will be reasonably knowledgeable - or they wouldn't be there. This is the
> style I usually use for reviews - a bit of history followed by some
> description and then a user report all in a rather terse style. Seems to work.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|