Re: [OM] 24/2 vs 21/2 vs 24/2.8

[Chuck Norcutt]

It's only large and heavy relative to an OM-3.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt



On 10/21/2010 2:44 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>> Here's your lens in desired focal length and speed  :-)
>> <
>> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/162614-USA/Canon_2512A002_Wide_Angle_EF_35mm.html
>>>
>>
>>
> Yes, but....
>
> That lens also defeats one of the benefits to have a short prime. Size and
> weight. Last week I played with the 85/1.2. Sweet lens, but big as a whale.
> Suppose it would be appropriate if I joined the Sea Shepherds?
>
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/