Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 22, Issue 30

Subject: Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 22, Issue 30
From: "Bill Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:33:48 -0500
I suspect that kodachrome demands such a high level of chemical
sophistication and such a low level of demand that it couldn'tpossibly be
worth the trouble.

Bill Pearce

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 1:19 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 22, Issue 30

I should have added:  Note that no micro-film company came forward to
salvage the Kodachrome line.  At least none that we know of.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Could well be but the price will be appropriate to the volume.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> Bob Whitmire wrote:
>> Shooting from the lip here, but I wonder when this happens if small, 
>> micro-film companies will spring up offering really nice boutique 
>> films that in some cases might far surpass what the Biguns produced 
>> in their day.
>>
>> --Bob Whitmire
>> "Art's just fart without the eff."
>> www.bobwhitmire.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 29, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> But I think that new films are a
>>> thing of the past and many old ones will slowly disappear.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz