I've just had a quick look at the dpreview test (http://bit.ly/b3g6IN)
and it doesn't look that bad, to my relatively uncritical eye. But since the
Panny 7-14 looks only slightly larger I should be tempted by that, especially
if money were no object.
Chris
On 9 May 2010, at 20:08, zuiko wrote:
> since you have a Panasonic body, I'ld go for the 7-14. The only
> disadvantage is that it does not use filters.
> It is faster and only a bit bigger (the 9-18 uncollapsed is probably
> about the same size), and apparently well corrected on Panasonic. I'm
> underwhelmed by the optical quality of the M.Zuiko's to say the least
> (from what I see in the tests).
>
> All the best,
>
> Iwert
>
> 2010/5/9 Nathan Wajsman
>> During my trip to US later this month, I plan to take advantage of exchange
>> rates and relative prices and get a wide angle zoom for my Panasonic GF-1.
>> When the new 9-18mm from Olympus was announced, I got pretty excited about
>> it, as its focal range is exactly what I need, and the light weight and
>> compactness are very much in keeping with the whole Micro 4/3 credo.
>>
>> However, reading the review of the lens on dpreview, I get a distinct
>> impression that the 9-18 is dog's breakfast: unsharp in corners (improves
>> when stopping down, but so does every lens), high chromatic aberration,
>> flare--in other words, a high price to pay for small size. The Panasonic
>> 7-14mm seems more solid and better performing.
>>
>> So now I am leaning towards the 7-14. But before placing the order, I would
>> like to hear any personal experiences with these 2 lenses, in Micro 4/3
>> mount (the 9-18 is available in regular 4/3 where it is apparently a lot
>> better optically). The $300 price difference is of no consequence.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|