| Subject: | Re: [OM] Speaking of paradigms [was The fate of the Universe [wasIMG: Friday Flower, sort of ...]] |
|---|---|
| From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:24:08 +0000 |
It was the present, I thought, Jez. But I promised to cease and desist with opinions (on language) until tomorrow :-) Chris On 15 Nov 2009, at 09:12, Jez Cunningham wrote: > Moose's use of the future conditional seemed correct to me. Of course your > present conditional was also perfection! > Jez -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 250/2.0, and my changed eyes, Dawid Loubser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT; China - a shift in global power?, Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Speaking of paradigms [was The fate of the Universe [wasIMG: Friday Flower, sort of ...]], Jez Cunningham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Speaking of paradigms [was The fate of the Universe [was IMG: Friday Flower, sort of ...]], Jez Cunningham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |