Brian Swale wrote:
> I notice that some of us when writing an URL which points to a jpeg image,
> their URL ends in ...jpg.htm or ..jpg.html
>
> My understanding of web language is that adding either <.htm> or <.html>
> is superfluous, and that <.jpg> is quite sufficient.
>
> Am I correct, or has there been a change in standards that I missed?
>
> Brian Swale.
No, it'll just be a page using the filename as part of the URL. Maybe an
automatically generated one from some prog or another?
D.
--
I'm a Mac, but I'm happy with my PC.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|