Correct me if I'm wrong, but when the 28/1.4 was in production, I think
internet trolls had a laundry llist of complaints.
Bill Pearce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos J. Santisteban" <zuiko21@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Nikkor 28/1.4, was: a glut of Zuiko 8/2.8s ?
> Hi Dawid and all,
> From: "Dawid Loubser" <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Question: How does
>
>> any of the Olympus fast wide angles (28|24|21 f/2.0) compare to the
>
>> Nikkor 28/1.4?
>
>> Has anybody tested? Of course, it's like four times the size of any of
>
>> the Zuikos,
>
>> but I'd love to see a performance comparison.
>
>
> I have no experience with that 28/1.4, but it's said to be great. A more
> suitable comparison would be the Nikkor 28/2 against the equivalent Zuiko,
> and I did such a test -- for astrophotography reasons, I have to admit, so
> my results may not be universally valid.
>
>
> Wide-open, the Nikkor was somewhat better than the Zuiko... but from 2.8
> and
> beyond, the Zuiko was MUCH better -- even though it won't improve much
> beyonf f/4!
>
> And now my Z 28/2 is broken :-(
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas
> IES Turaniana (Roquetas de Mar, Almeria)
> <http://cjss.sytes.net/>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.56/2302 - Release Date: 08/14/09
06:10:00
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|