ML Archiv: Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite

from Ken Norton

Subject:	Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:32:55 -0500

>
> Is the E-3's compression tighter?
>

No, but it does have a nice rear end.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Brian Swale Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, AS Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Russ Butler Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Moose Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Ken Norton Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Ken Norton Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Chris Barker Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Ken Norton

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Why don't they just fix it...., Ken Norton
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] no sightings of AG !!, Sue Pearce
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, AS
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Russ Butler
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]