>
> No, it's not the MIJ although they comment that it's multicoated so it's
> later rather than earlier. The MIJ name ring just says "ZUIKO" and not
> "F.ZUIKO". Also, on the MIJ, the focal length precedes the aperture
> whereas this older lens lists the aperture first.
>
I'm questioning that because I wasn't aware of any of that lens having
"F.ZUIKO" being multicoated. I'm wondering if they mistook the black-nose as
being multicoated. I could be wrong, though, as I've been well-experienced
in being wrong, lately.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|