You never know, just like the DZ8mm which is much bigger than the OM 16/3.5
but does not provide better image quality.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt"
> What I wonder is why isn't the prime a 10.5mm f/2 which, for m4/3,
> should be much easier to produce than a 21/2 for OM.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|