Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Manual Focus vs AF

Subject: Re: [OM] Manual Focus vs AF
From: Chris Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 04:19:23 -0400
Moose,

That fits my samples too. My dad's lens with the slow aperture is an even
older one than yours: 3,234,xxx

The two good mij's that I have are in the 5,8xx,xxx range. They must have
improved them along the way!


-- 
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-747-3962

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!


On 5/10/09 4:12 AM, "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Wayne Harridge wrote:
>> Yeah, forgot to mention that.  Thought to be the best optically, though
>> mechanically maybe not, I think some suffered from oily/sticky diaphragms.
>>   
> 
> Oly made a LOT of mij 50/1.8s. Of four miJs that have passed through my
> hands,  with S/Ns between 3,500,000 and 3,700,000, one had a slightly
> slow diaphragm mechanism. The one I kept is 5,814,xxx, and very snappy.
> 
> Moose


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz