Chris Barker wrote:
> Thanks, Moose. I was able to see your place in my mind's eye, especially
> with your description of the afternoon light.
>
If you ever get over in this neck of the woods, do drop in.
> I like all bar the details of the covers. The last one, Still Life with
> Annie, could have done without the knob on the right-hand side, but I like
> the overall composition and light.
>
I tried cropping it out, but didn't like the result. If I cut it all
out, the clock right against the edge of the image doesn't look good to
me. Cut out only part, and it is even less identifiable and odd. Part of
the tiny project was to use only found objects, without setting them up,
so i didn't just move it. It is, by the way, designed to be a rolling
foot massager. I don't like it much for that, but grab a stick and it's
a pretty good rhythm instrument.
> Oh, and none of them is too sharp ... :-)
>
Yeah, sigh. I don't know what to do about that. The thing is - I have
20-10 or better combined vision. So the world just looks sharper to me.
I know this 'cause when I cover the 20/20 eye, everything gets sorta
soft. I wish there were a way to demonstrate the opposite for others.
Anyway, I try, really I do, not to overdo the sharpness for web images,
but darn it! They just don't look right, or like I recall the subjects.
A. Sharpish Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|