| Subject: | Re: [OM] A wasted effort |
|---|---|
| From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:11:27 +1100 |
> Chuck Norcutt <> wrote: > > All I can say is that it has lost fine detail that the > camera and lens are capable of resolving and did resolve at a wider > aperture. > Yes, I assume there is some loss of detail as the jpeg processing has resulted in a smaller file for the f22 shot. I wonder if an XOR of the 2 images would show anything interesting ? ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Z. 35 shift question, Wayne Harridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Moose |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Jan Steinman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |