Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Misguided analysis?

Subject: Re: [OM] Misguided analysis?
From: Chris Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:48:04 -0500
Fine for wedding photographers, but as a fine art photographer who does a
lot of outdoor landscape and architecture work in BAD weather (yes, I often
stand in the rain to shoot) a weather sealed body is a requirement.

The OM-4T is sealed and mine has survived some tremendous downpours, as has
my old Nikon F4s.


-- 
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-747-3962

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!



On 2/13/09 9:16 PM, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I recall asking my photo mentor once whether he was concerned enough
> about rain to warrant spending the extra on a splash resistant body or
> at least buying a good rain cover.  He said:  "I've never known a bride
> that wanted to be photographed in the rain.  I don't worry about it."  :-)
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> Some significant discordance in DR comments in the DPR review  compared
>> to DXOMark.
>> Haven't really seen consistent rants on drizzle bothering the 5DII.
>> B&H is still back ordered.
>> Not much choice for OM digital film with live view.  I wonder if they
>> are rushing them out the door for now.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://tinyurl.com/bv5ac7
>> 
>> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz