It's not you yourself, Chuck. It is the problem itself ( *per se* ), a
semiotic problem.
Maybe I feel too wit today, while should be the other way; but this
point makes me recall a book by Michael Foucault <Les Mots et Les
Choses>, a rather unreadable book btw.
;-)
Fernando.
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I obviously read this differently from others. If only the list name
> (vs the contents) is under discussion I have no problem with OM.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|