Hi Dean,
That is probably very true. I wouldn't mind both eventually :-)
But if/when I get the bellows, I may look out for a 38mm f/2.8.
The faster f/2.0 speed appealed to me for the 20mm, but I guess this is
negated by the much less actual light due to the higher magnification.
First up, though, would be to play with the 90mm f/2.0 which I do have.
regards,
Dawid
P.S. Beautiful images in your gallery, looking forward to read more
"how-to" information :-)
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 21:18 -0500, Dean Hansen wrote:
> Jan noted:
>
> Unless you're going to get the matching lieberkühn reflector, stage,
> and light source, I think you might find the 38/2.8 to be more fun.
> The 20 just gets to darn close for anything useful unless it is flat
> and specially lit.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|