But how else would we get to lengthy and informative discussions?
Chuck Norcutt
Jim Nichols wrote:
> Michael and Chuck,
>
> The distractions in my subject line referred to the bright OOF background
> objects in my posted image, not to the resulting lengthy and informative
> discussions. I should be more specific in writing subject lines.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Collins" <l43g20th@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 4:32 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: Distractions and PS Lessons
>
>
>> On 5/27/08 5:27 PM, "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Fellows, I did not intend to distract the list for so long...
>> Technically, on-topic posts don't count as "distractions" :-) .
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1469 - Release Date: 5/27/2008
> 1:25 PM
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|