Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: (OT) stopping

Subject: [OM] Re: (OT) stopping
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 09:57:09 -0400
Actually, John, it's a term from the game of cricket. You see,  
crickets are very annoying creatures. When they get into the house,  
they can make a horrendous racket. But they also have the unnerving  
quality of falling silent at just the right moment to prevent the  
seeker from discovering their hiding places. (You wondered where the  
seekers came from in the Harry Potter books? That's right, cricket  
hunters, or, as we know them, batsmen, though Ms. Rowling took some  
liberties with the concept with that whole broom flying thing.)

In Jolly Olde many years ago, some chaps got together to discuss  
their large country manors filled with chirping crickets. Sleep  
depravation was becoming a problem. In true English tradition, they  
decided the best approach would be a competition. They dressed in  
white so as to be more easily visible in the dark, and chose as their  
weapon a long flat board with a handle, which they called a bat, so  
called because one of their number, before the rules of the game  
could be settled upon, thumped a passing bat out of the air with his  
stick. (History has taken the identity of this gentleman, but  
tradition holds that he was a progenitor of the later, much greater,  
Sir Donald Bradman.)

The bat is particularly well suited not only for squashing crickets  
on cold English stone floors, but also swatting them out of the air,  
as noted by the bat-swatting incident which resulted in the name of  
the device. Because of its shape, it's also useful for smashing  
crickets that hide behind objects of furniture, which are lumped into  
the broad category of stumps for purposes of simplicity and clarity.

So after our chaps got dressed in white and tossed back a few gin-and- 
tonics, they set out to smash crickets. One person on the team was  
designated as the cricket collector. He carried a basket, called a  
wicket, to put the shattered corpses in so as to determine which team  
won the competition. But crickets are resilient creatures, and just  
because one has been smashed flat by a bat does not necessarily mean  
it's dead. So the wickets were lined with an adhesive substance to  
keep the crickets from being able to crawl out. Hence the term  
"sticky wicket."

At the end of the evening, the wickets were collected and the cricket  
corpses counted, and more gin-and-tonics were consumed.

Of course the modern game bears little resemblance to the game of its  
origin, but isn't that the way of it all?

I hope all of this clears everything up for you. If you have an  
further questions, you might address them to our brethren from the  
Commonwealth. This little note pretty well exhausts my knowledge of  
cricket.

Helpfully yours,

--Bob Whitmire
www.bwp33.com




On May 1, 2008, at 9:05 AM, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Batsman.  Is that some Australian dude that catches bats with his bare
> hands?


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz