Nathan, how about the size and balance? The PanaLeica looks kind of
large and that could be deceiving. Does either one balance better
than the others?
At 10:10 PM 4/17/2008, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>Hi John,
>
>I cannot honestly say that I see a huge quality difference between
>the two lenses. Both are excellent, including at the widest
>apertures. The Leica may be slightly better at f1.4 but the Sigma is
>certainly no slouch. It is by far the best Sigma lens I have ever
>owned, both in terms of performance and build quality (as opposed to
>all the Sigma zooms I have ever tried, which all felt flimsy). I like
>Leica glass and am willing to spend the extra, but I would not
>hesitate to recommend the Sigma.
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
please use richard at imagecraft.com)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|