Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Bad? Looks like it belongs in the nearest art gallery.
>
I agree, that's a good looking pinhole image. Everything equally in or
out of focus, depending on viewpoint, soft tonal graduations.
There are two things going on in this image that have nothing to do with
the pinhole. There is a lot of big grain. Not too bad elsewhere, but It
seems too much in the sky to me, overwhelming the smooth pinhole look.
Also, the histogram is quite unbalanced, with no pixels above about 215.
Tame the grain and stretch the histogram to get some true highlights and
it seems to me to be a really nice pinhole image.
<http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Smoothy/Pinhole.htm>
Andrew had trouble with a Holgamods pinhole on his 5D, but this looks
fine on film.
Moose
> photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Not much of an image, but...
>>
>> Bought a pin hole body cap a while ago (from a site posted by Moose -
>> holgamod I think) & just got round to developing the film, so in case anyone
>> might be interested here's my second ever pin hole picture - best of a bad
>> lot, need some more practice.
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6840646
>>
>> OM-1n, Rollei Retro 100
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|