Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: lithium iron phosphate batteries, was: TSA: Safe Travel with Ba

Subject: [OM] Re: lithium iron phosphate batteries, was: TSA: Safe Travel with Batteries and Devices
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 07:34:26 -0500
Yes, about electric vehicles.  Since it appears that Li-ion can catch 
fire from impact of physical damage I'm not sure I'd want to drive a car 
with a trunk full of Li-ion batteries.  But maybe that's no worse than a 
big tank of gasoline.

Chuck Norcutt

Tim Hughes wrote:
> Chuck,
>       Yes the capacity is lower than Li-ion, but has many other advantages :
> 
> Low self discharge rate so similar to the Hybrid niMH (Eneloops),can leave on 
> shelf for a month or
> two and still has most of capacity without recharge. 
> High rate capability so much better for high power aplications like cars and 
> power tools.
> (For example the small cells I put into the Metz can produce 70A 
> continuously. )
> Can fully recharge in 10mins,means you don't need to have multiple batteries 
> for many purposes. 
> Very good Cycle life >1000
> easier to charge.
> Long shelf life, (many years unlike Li-ion which are 2-3years)
> Non combustible electrolyte and no li metal formed unbound( even if abused 
> unlike Li-ion
> etc.),does not burn easily and does not explode.
> Even though the high rate is not that important for Metz (The flash draws 
> about 12A pk) the
> impedance is low and constant so capacity is independent of usage pattern 
> unlike SLA. 
> There are two different technologies used for LiFePO4 cells, one uses 
> microparticle and are  
> capable of very much higher currents. Curently these are being used in some 
> new Dewalt power
> tools. There is a huge patent war brewing on who owns the technology. The big 
> application is going
> to be in Electric Vehicles and hybrid vehicles.
> 
> 
> Tim Hughes
> 
> --- Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I've never heard of lithium iron phosphate batteries before but located 
>> this MIT tech blurb on the web.  According to the article Li-FePO 
>> batteries have about 1/2 the capacity of Li-ion cells.  I assume your 
>> comment about increasing the number of full dumps is relative to SLA cells?
>> <http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=17362>
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Tim Hughes wrote:
>>> The Lithium-ion and regular Lithium rechargeables are extremely flammable, 
>>> but the new
>> generation
>>> of high power LiFePO4 cells are not, but I am sure the TSA is not going to 
>>> differentiate! 
>>>
>>> I have just converted one of my Metz CT60 flashes to Li-FePO4 and it cut 
>>> the weight by about
>>> 1.5lbs and actually increases the number of full dumps. Charge time with an 
>>> external charger
>> is
>>> 15minutes, this really is a huge improvement over the normal sealed Lead 
>>> acids.
>>>
>>> Tim Hughes
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz