Well, the advantages of being a 2 system guy with these two are that the
dimensions of E-3 and 5D (152 x 113 x 75 mm) are in the same league, as is
the weight.
Guess that especially the weight is really putting me off. After handling
the 510 I found the E-1 heavy... with 660 gr.
Regards, Frank.
PS You must have some hairs ;-). Dimensions of 410 are 129,5 x 91 x 51 mm.
2007/10/16, Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Oh, one other thing:
>
> There's a "life-size" photo of the E-3, looking down from the top,
> inside the brochure. It's just a hair larger than my E-410. Now
> *there's* something you're never gonna get in a Canon -- compact size.
> And yes, it's got the LCD on the top-right-hand side, just like the E-1.
>
> Hmm. 5fps (no mention of an upper limit that I can find). 1/8000 sec
> top shutter speed. 1/250 sec. X-sync. Wireless flash (up to four
> channels). AF range of -2 to +19 EV. 11-point full twin-cross AF
> system. IS (two types). Metering: digital ESP 49-point metering;
> centre-weighted average; spot; spot w/highlight; spot w/shadow. Etc.
> Yada yada yada.
>
> 810g body only. 142mm (W) x 116mm (H) x 74.5mm (D), excluding
> protrusions.
>
> Regardless of initial reservations, I'd like to get my hands on this
> puppy. But I'm betting I'm still going to have to be a two-system guy
> (successor to the 5D, I think).
>
>
> Garth
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|