Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad

Subject: [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:06:34 +0800
I know, but if someone say he found a lens was soft wide open, do you think 
he was shooting landscape? Most likely peripheral resolution will not be the 
point of complain.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 8:34 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad


> Perhaps you have forgotten that shooting with the E300 you're only testing 
> the sweet spot in the center.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>>  -------Original Message-------
>>  From: C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  Subject: [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad
>>  Sent: Oct 14 '07 11:04
>>
>>
>>  My experience with the 40/2 is different, it is quite sharp wide open, 
>> here
>>  is the test I just made with E300, all shoot in RAW and converted with
>>  Olympus Viewer, sharpness -5. Camera in tripod with 2 seconds shutter 
>> delay.
>>
>>  The lens in compare is the OM Zuiko 50/2 Macro. Yes, the 50/2 is sharper 
>> but
>>  I won't say the 40/2 is soft wide open.
>>
>>  http://www.accura.com.hk/40F2_F2.jpg
>>  http://www.accura.com.hk/50F2_F2.jpg
>>  http://www.accura.com.hk/40F2_F4.jpg
>>  http://www.accura.com.hk/50F2_F4.jpg
>>
>>  C.H.Ling


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz