Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Is Dr. Flash in jeopardy?

Subject: [OM] Re: Is Dr. Flash in jeopardy?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:18:34 -0400
I hadn't paid much attention to the details but, based on the wide angle 
distortion of the bride in that shot, my guess is that it was made with 
the 24-70 and not the 70-200.  Making the bride seem wider than she is 
is a no-no in my book.  Apart from price, it's why I use a 28-80 instead 
of a 24-70.  Makes it harder to introduce accidental people distortion.

Chuck Norcutt

Richard Lovison wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Oops.  Better give the link
>> <http://cliffmautner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/ok-its-after-1a.html>
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>> Some very nice, natural light wedding photography with the Nykon D3. 
>>> Most shot at ISO 1600-6400.  What?  We don' need no steenkin' flash!
> 
> Geezz, 6400 looks better than the E-1 at 800.  That 70-200mm/2.8 seems 
> to have incredible depth of field wide open.  Is that possibly a misprint?
> 
> Richard

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz