ps this took all of 5 minutes to get from here to there & back again.
maybe the problem is elsewhere?
David
David Carter wrote:
> There is patently a reduction in list traffic. And what is still there
> seems slow.
>
> seems like several Subjects have been removed. By List Mum? And maybe a
> few members @ the same time.
>
> Perhaps it's time we got back on topic, again?
>
> David
> Cricket is a great game, when we're winning.
>
>
>
> John Hermanson wrote:
>
>> You said it. Once again, a full weekend would normally yield about 300
>> emails, this time 100. (insert sound of crickets here).
>>
>> John
>> CPS, Inc.
>>
>> On 9/17/2007 1:10:55 PM, Geilfuss Charles
>> (charles.geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Boy it sure has been quiet today.
>>> I've received nothing
>>> since early this morning. And my own reply to a posting hasn't
>>> made it
>>> yet. Are we on the air? Tap...Tap...Tap. Is this thing working?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Charlie
>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|