Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: New Paper for the Fine Art Printer

Subject: [OM] Re: New Paper for the Fine Art Printer
From: Andrew Wiese <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:10:25 -0700 (PDT)

But exactly this reviewer panned the quality of black and white papers in his
last review a few months ago (there's a link in the new article).  Windsor
linked to that one at the time, too.  Tru(e)ly.

-----------------------------------
Chris, I do not question any of that. I do truely believe that this
paper is an outstanding advancement forward and is exactly what you
and I have been needing.

My beef is in the reviews of this and other paper and printing
technologies. Last year's "perfection" is this year's garbage.
Meanwhile, those of us who have been beefing about the poor quality
of digital B&W prints are panned as recalcetrant nimrods stuck in the
stone age.

AG


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated
for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow  

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/New-Paper-for-the-Fine-Art-Printer-tf4420320.html#a12631662
Sent from the Olympus Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz