> http://www.e-fotografija.si/templates/?a=1060&z=93&page=1
>
It's interesting, if only for the unpleasant mentions of the 35-100/2. I was
unable to find a review of that lens in the English pages. Perhaps we need
Borat to check the others.
The glowing review of the 90-250 is the only mention of that lens I've seen.
A review of the 35-100, of course, would make the one bad review, which is
also probably the only review of any kind. The English speaking press has
ignored most of the later E lenses.
Bill Pearce
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|