| Subject: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:04:11 -0700 |
Not too unusual, I think. He mentions it from time to time especially when a review is delayed because of it. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On / June 29, 2007 CE, at 10:44 PM, Phil wrote: > DP review did have to replace the first E410 that they were > testing. I think > it was exposure problems > though. > > > Phil ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: E-510 Test Image, Andrew Fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement, Moose |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement, Bob Whitmire |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |