Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Signatures [Was: Re: OT Typos]

Subject: [OM] Re: Signatures [Was: Re: OT Typos]
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:31:00 -0500
Jan, thanks for the explanation.  My system is not a Mac which may be
why I didn't recognize how it is done.

And the quote from 'W' that was included with your response?  Even
*more* depressing.  I'm going to have an extra tall OJ this morning.
Sigh.

ScottGee1

On 3/24/07, Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Jan, I may have to stop reading the quotes in your sig -- this one is
> > particularly depressing!
>
> Sorry about that. I'm trying to focus on more empowering ones, but
> they seem to draw the most ire.
>
> > BTW, I assume the variations are automated . . .
>
> Mac OS X Mail. "Preferences... --> Signatures --> Choose Signature:
> At Random". But you can defeat that for when the fog lifts long
> enough for you to recall a particularly apropos nugget.
>
> :::: Because the -- all which is on the table begins to address the
> big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculated, for
> example, is on the table. Whether or not benefits rise based upon
> wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the
> formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those
> different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing those with
> personal  accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more
> likely to be -- or closer delivered to that has been promised. Does
> that make any sense to you? -- George W. Bush ::::
> :::: Jan Steinman http://www.VeggieVanGogh.com ::::

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz