Oh, I well understood that it was not a statistically valid data set. I
was just surprised that *any* of the high priced, weather sealed Canons
had succumbed to 90 minutes of drizzle. I think Moose had the answer
which was age of the the seals, especially the lens mount.
Chuck Norcutt
Stephen Scharf wrote:
> Chuck,
> You should read Michael Reichmann's comments about this on Luminous
> Landscape.
> There were 8X as many Canon's being (N=45) used as Nikons
> N=5)...before making judgements,
> one should gather a statistically valid data set (same nos. of camera
> bodies for both Marques).
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|