First of all, excellent pix! Thanks for the effort!
HATE it when I know I have something but can't find it.
Coincidentally, I'm looking for a Haoda screen I bought for my dSLR
and can't find it -- again.
I wonder if the 2-13 screen is a bit damaged. There seems to be a bit
of wear/breakdown on a lot of the hexagonal cells. The 1-1 is
certainly the odd man out.
Cheers!/Scottgee1
On 3/2/07, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After spending two hours I still cannot locate my OM40 (it is a faulty one).
> I can only take the screen from OM707, it could have similar construction as
> the OM40, here is the comparison to the 2-13:
>
> OM707
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM707a.jpg
> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM707b.jpg
>
> 2-13
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/2-13a.jpg
> http://www.accura.com.hk/2-13b.jpg
>
> On the matte side they share the same cell size but look slightly different
> in shape even they are both hexagon. On the fresnel ring side the space in
> 2-13 is a little dense. I can't check them on one camera as the OM707 screen
> does not fit to my OM4.
>
> And here is the 1-1 screen.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/1-1a.jpg
> http://www.accura.com.hk/1-1b.jpg
>
> If I found my OM40 I will do it again.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ScottGee1" <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:11 AM
> Subject: [OM] Re: Mysteries of the Universe (OM Universe)
>
>
> >
> > I'd be very interested in knowing the results of that examination!
> >
> > ScottGee1
> >
> > On 2/28/07, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not sure about the brightness but I'm pretty sure they are not the same.
> >> I
> >> remember the 2-series screen is much finer. I will try to miscroscope
> >> them
> >> on the week end.
> >>
> >> C.H.Ling
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
