Hmmm . . . if both scanners show the "small lines" it suggests they
are on the negative. The resolution of the Fuji is likely different
which would account for the variance in size.
But . . . priorities -- Happy cometing!/ScottGee1
On 1/30/07, Brian Swale <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ScottGee1 asked about the scanner lines.
>
> What I see are minutely small lines parallel to the short side of the print,
> ie,
> the start and end edges of the scanning process. Each line of scan is a little
> bit darker or lighter than its neighbour. In some cases.
>
> This suggests to me there might be something wrong with the way the
> stepper motor is carrying out its work. But the FUJI scanner prints at Photo
> & Video results in scan that show the same, though smaller.
>
> The other defect with the HP Photosmart scans relates to artifacts parallel to
> the long sides.
>
> They are what you might imagine if somebody had delicately dragged a
> damp little finger-tip along the print from one end to the other in about 4
> places. There is a ? 20 - 30 pixel-wide trail of slightly out-of-place pixels
> in
> each spot. You have to look more or less hard to see them. Should not be
> there.
>
> I might post examples, but not now as I'm (again!!) going out in a moment to
> try to see Comet McNaught..
>
> Brian
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|