I said in response to an earlier query that it was Kodachrome. I scanned this
one a year or two ago and can't lay my hands on it right now. The more I think
about it, it might have been Ektachrome.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Phil Stanley" <pcks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> The range of tones and colour is simply wow! what film was this shot with
> Walt (presuming)
> and was it a neg scan? Quality
>
> Phil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:49 PM
> Subject: [OM] Yet another photo
>
>
> > The view downstream from where we used to camp a couple of times a year in
> > the Smokies. And, no, I won't tell you where it is. It's a well-kept
> > secret, and I plan to be there again.
> >
> > http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/media/192375/site1145.jpg
> >
> > Walt
> > --
> > "Anything more than 500 yards from
> > the car just isn't photogenic." --
> > Edward Weston
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
