Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E-400 vs OM-4ti

Subject: [OM] Re: E-400 vs OM-4ti
From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:03:44 -0500
I think the lens you mention is the first Olympus lens I've heard of 
with a plastic mount.  Is it a 17.5 to 45, something like that?  The 
14-45 is metal.

John
CPS, Inc.


On 1/11/2007 3:29:13 PM, Paul Shields (paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> The mount on the E-400 is solid metal, and just the same as on the E-1.
> 
> Of course, it's not unusual for the cheapest lenses to have plastic
> mounts. It keeps the price and weight down, but I tend to agree on the
> yuckiness factor.
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> John Hermanson wrote:
> > You mean the lens on the body (kit lens) had a plastic mount (yuck) or
> > the E-400 body mount was plastic (double yuck) ?
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > John Hermanson
> > Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
> > 21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
> > 631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
> > http://www.zuiko.com  |  omtech1 AT verizon.net
> >


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz