keith_w wrote:
> Brian Swale wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Chris wrote
>>> Well for one thing, the OM 50 f 1.8 has horrid Bokeh, while Leica lenses are
>>> usually better in that regard. The Leica 50mm f2 Summicron R is the only
>>> Leica
>>> 50 that I have personally used and it's far superior to the Olympus lens. I
>>> Like
>>> the OM-4T much better then the Leica R4 that I had. I hated the ergonomics
>>> of
>>> the R4 so much I sold it and bought another OM-4T but I miss that Summicron.
>>>
>>> Here's a photo taken with the OM 50mm f1.8, shot at aperture of f4.
>>>
http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/fine_art/portfolio/marys-bar/photopages/marys-bar15.htm
>>>
>>> See how harsh the out of focus areas are?
> That seems a matter of interpretation. I suspect it's a film and/or
> processing problem, not a lens problem.
> Reason I say that is, there seems to be little very latitude in the B&W,
> between deep shadows and highlights.
> To me, the bokeh doesn't seem untoard.
I meant "untoward!" ;-)
keith
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|