Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Busting a myth

Subject: [OM] Re: Busting a myth
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 03:13:38 -0800
Moose wrote:
Here's a different version of my comparison that shows the differences 
more easily by using overlaid images. Works with FireFox and Netscape, 
but not IE 
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/UpSample/Uprez.htm>.

Moose

Moose wrote:
> I did the same thing Butzi did (but only posted it here) - except I 
> did it with a practical image of the sort of thing I photograph, not a 
> test chart.
>
> And I didn't do the stepwise interpolation myself. I used FM's Stair 
> Interpolation Pro, which is for any image, and FM Resize Pro for the 
> camera it was taken with, a 300D.
>
> The results spoke for themselves for me. I don't know if FM does 
> anything beyond simple 10% stepwise interpolation, but it works better 
> than any of the three PS bicubic options for me.
>
> And the camera specific Resize Pro is even better 
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/UpSample/resize.htm>.
>
> Be sure to look at the noise in the shadows on the slicker, as well as 
> the hat creases, cheek and gloves. The RP versions don't look uprezed 
> to me.
>
> If I ever have to uprez a 5D image, I'll be getting Resize Pro for it.




==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz