| Subject: | [OM] Re: 200mm only at infinity |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:08:16 -0500 |
Hmmm. Pretty close. 141.42135623730950488016887242097 to be more precise. Square root of 2 to the rescue. Chuck Norcutt AG Schnozz wrote: > Well, it's been noted here in the past that halfway between 100 > and 200 mm is not 150, but closer to 135. > > AG ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Scanner, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Ignore - just a test, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 200mm only at infinity, AG Schnozz |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 200mm only at infinity, Jeff Keller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |